The Right Worker Can Still Be the Wrong Match

It is 7:15 am on a Monday at a busy distribution centre in Birmingham. Orders have increased unexpectedly, and the business needs additional warehouse operatives for the next four weeks. The agency is contacted, the vacancy is urgent, and a worker with previous warehouse experience is available. Their CV shows experience in stock handling, picking and packing, so the worker is supplied and arrives ready to start.

At first glance, everything appears to have gone according to plan. The hirer has filled the vacancy, the agency has responded quickly, and the worker has relevant experience. But within the first few hours, the supervisor discovers that much of the work at this particular site involves using a warehouse management system and operating equipment the worker has never used before. The worker is experienced, but their experience does not quite match the demands of this particular assignment. The problem, therefore, may not be that the worker lacks ability. The problem may be that the match was never as precise as it appeared.

A CV can tell you what someone has done. It does not always tell you what they can do in your workplace.

Speed Only Solves Part of the Problem

Temporary staffing often places a necessary emphasis on speed. A vacancy needs to be covered, a shift needs to be staffed, and an agency is expected to respond quickly. But speed only solves part of the staffing problem. A worker can have several years of relevant experience and still not be the right match for a particular assignment if the duties, environment, equipment, working pattern or required qualifications are different. Someone who has worked successfully in one warehouse may not automatically have experience with the equipment, systems or processes used in another. Someone with years of retail experience may be highly capable but still not be the right person for a role that involves early-morning stock replenishment, heavy manual handling or particular workplace procedures they have never encountered before. (For more on balancing the two, see last-minute staffing without compromising quality.)

This is why the quality of the information supplied by the hirer matters. Current GOV.UK guidance states that before supplying a worker, an employment business must obtain sufficient information from the hirer about the assignment. This includes the type of work, location, working hours, known health and safety risks and controls, as well as the experience, references, training and qualifications required for the position.

That is considerably more information than a job title. "Warehouse operative", "retail assistant" or "production worker" may describe the broad occupation, but they do not necessarily describe the actual assignment. The difference between a general warehouse role and a role involving specific equipment, a particular working environment or a specialist process can determine whether a worker is genuinely suitable.

Availability Is Not the Same as Suitability

Imagine a retail business in Manchester needs six temporary workers for an early-morning stock replenishment shift. The agency has several people available:

One has worked in retail for three years but has mainly worked in customer-facing roles.
Another has experience in supermarket replenishment and regularly works early shifts.
A third has warehouse experience but has never worked in a retail environment.

All three may be hardworking, reliable and experienced, but that does not mean all three are equally suited to the assignment. The question is not simply whether someone has worked before or whether they can start tomorrow. It is whether their experience and circumstances actually align with what the role requires.

This distinction matters because responsible staffing is not simply about asking, "Who is available?" It is about asking, "Who is suitable for this particular assignment?" GOV.UK guidance on the Conduct Regulations places requirements on employment businesses around suitability. Where an employment business discovers that a work-seeker may be unsuitable for a job, it has obligations to make appropriate enquiries and, where necessary, inform the hirer and stop supplying the worker. Suitability is therefore not something that should only be considered after a worker has already started struggling. It is part of the process of making the placement in the first place.

The Better the Brief, the Better the Match

Matching works in both directions. An agency cannot accurately identify the right worker if the hirer has provided only a vague description of the vacancy, and a hirer cannot properly assess whether a supplied worker is appropriate if the requirements of the assignment have not been clearly established.

Saying, "We need two temporary production workers for next Monday," gives an agency a starting point, but it leaves important questions unanswered. Saying, "We need two temporary production workers for four weeks, working 6am to 2pm, carrying out defined production and packing duties in a food manufacturing environment, with particular experience and training requirements," gives the agency a much clearer basis for finding an appropriate worker.

The difference may appear small, but it can affect the entire placement. Regulation 18 of the Conduct Regulations identifies information such as the job title, type of work, location, days and hours, known health and safety risks, and relevant experience, training, qualifications and authorisations as important assignment information. A detailed brief is therefore not simply administrative paperwork between a hirer and an agency. It is part of the matching process. The clearer the hirer is about what the worker will actually be expected to do, the better positioned the agency is to identify someone whose experience genuinely fits. Our guide on what to check before hiring temporary staff covers the questions worth answering up front.

The Worker Needs to Understand the Assignment Too

There is another side to the equation that can easily be overlooked. The temporary worker also needs enough information to understand what they are accepting. Under Regulation 21 of the Conduct Regulations, information about the assignment provided to the worker includes the hirer's identity and business, start date, expected duration, position, type of work, location, days and hours, known health and safety risks, and relevant experience, training, qualifications and authorisations. This matters because a worker cannot make an informed decision about an assignment they do not properly understand.

Consider a worker who accepts what they believe is a general warehouse position and arrives to discover that the assignment involves a specialised task requiring experience they do not have. The problem is no longer simply that the worker may not be suitable. There is now a gap between what the worker understood they were accepting and what the workplace actually expects them to do. The supervisor may feel that the agency has sent the wrong person. The agency may feel that the hirer's requirements were not sufficiently clear. The worker may feel that the assignment was not accurately explained. What could have been a straightforward matching exercise before the start date can become a difficult conversation after the worker has already arrived.

When a Placement Does Not Work, Look Beyond the Worker

When a temporary placement does not work, it can be tempting to conclude immediately that the worker was simply "not good enough". Sometimes a worker genuinely is not suitable, and responsible staffing requires that this is recognised. But that conclusion should not be automatic. Perhaps:

The role was not clearly explained.
The required experience was never communicated to the agency.
The worker's previous experience was relevant but not directly transferable to this particular workplace.
The working hours were different from what the worker expected.
The duties had changed after the original request (see The Assignment Changed. Did Your Temporary Workers Know?).
Or the worker genuinely did not have the skills required.

The important point is to understand what actually happened before deciding what the problem was. Good staffing requires enough information to distinguish between a worker issue, a matching issue and an assignment-information issue. That distinction can prevent unnecessary replacement, help the hirer communicate its requirements more effectively and help the agency improve future placements. It also creates a fairer process for workers, because not every unsuccessful placement is evidence that the worker was incapable of doing the job.

The Right Match Is About More Than a Long CV

A suitable worker is not necessarily the person with the longest CV or the greatest number of years of experience. Suitability can involve experience, qualifications, availability, working pattern, authorisation, understanding of the role and the particular demands of the assignment. For some positions, professional or legal requirements may be decisive. For others, practical experience or familiarity with a particular environment may matter more. The key is understanding what genuinely matters for the assignment rather than relying on broad labels such as "experienced" or "reliable".

This is particularly important in temporary staffing because workers can move between very different workplaces. Someone may be highly capable in one setting but require additional support, training or experience before carrying out similar work somewhere else. A good agency does not simply look for a person who appears to fit the job title. A good hirer does not simply ask for "someone with experience". Both sides need to understand what the assignment actually requires and then use that information to determine what a suitable match looks like. Even with a good match, a proper induction still matters: see They Started the Shift. But Were They Ready for the Job?

A Successful Placement Should Work for All Three Sides

The strongest temporary staffing arrangements are not necessarily those where an agency fills a vacancy in the shortest possible time. They are arrangements where the hirer receives someone who is appropriate for the work, the worker understands the assignment they have accepted, and the agency has enough information to make a responsible match. That requires collaboration before the first shift begins:

The hirer needs to describe the assignment accurately.
The agency needs to assess suitability appropriately.
The worker needs accurate information about the role.

And when something does not match what was expected, the issue needs to be examined rather than hidden behind the assumption that temporary workers are interchangeable.

They are not. Every worker brings a particular combination of skills, experience and circumstances, while every assignment has its own requirements. The objective of responsible staffing is to bring those two things together as accurately as possible. When that happens, the result is more than a vacancy being filled. It is a worker entering a role they understand, a hirer receiving support that actually meets its needs, and an agency able to stand behind the quality of the placement.

Because filling the vacancy is not the same as filling it well.

At Meet Resources

At Meet Resources, we believe responsible staffing begins with understanding what the hirer actually needs and identifying workers who genuinely fit the assignment. The goal is not simply to send someone because a vacancy needs to be filled. It is to create a match that makes sense for the work, the hirer and the temporary worker. Read more about choosing a temporary staffing partner.

The right worker. The right assignment. The right information.

References

Talk to Meet Resources about hiring temporary staff.

Back to all articles See how Meet Resources works